see articles below:

The management of metastatic spinal cord compression: a radiotherapeutic success ceiling.

Leviov M, Dale J, S  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993 Sep 30;27(2):231-4

Department of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

PURPOSE: In assessing the effectiveness of the management of metastatic spinal cord or cauda equina compression, we performed a retrospective analysis of 70 patients with this complication whom we treated from 1985 to 1989. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The most frequent primary diagnoses in our series were carcinomas of unknown origin and of the breast, lymphoproliferative disease, lung cancer, and prostatic carcinoma. We used the Findlay classification to group all patients according to their pre-therapeutic functional motor status as Grade I (24 patients or 34%), Grade II (27, or 39%) or Grade III (19 or 27%). Treatment consisted of 30-45 Gy of irradiation (using two different schedules) together with high-dose dexamethasone; in only five cases was there surgical intervention. RESULTS: We found that a powerful predictor of response to radiotherapy was the patient's neurologic status (Findlay grade) at the time of diagnosis: 66% of previously ambulatory patients remained so, whereas 30% of non-ambulatory patients and only 16% of paraplegic patients regained the ability to walk. Another important predictor of response was primary tumor histology, with the most favorable responses to radiation therapy having been observed in lymphoproliferative diseases and in breast cancer, but with some response in other radiosensitive malignancies as well. CONCLUSION: The similarity of our results to those of other centers leads us to conclude that a radiotherapeutic success ceiling of 80% may have been reached for Findlay Grade I patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. In view of this, we suggest that future therapeutic endeavour would be best directed toward early diagnosis of the condition.

Metastatic spinal cord compression. Occurrence, symptoms, clinical presentations and prognosis in 398 patients with spinal cord compression.

Bach F,  Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;107(1-2):37-43

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Herlev, Denmark.

We reviewed all medical records concerning patients suffering from spinal cord or cauda equina compression (SCC) secondary to cancer, in the eastern part of Denmark, from 1979 through 1985. During the period the incidence of SCC in cancer patients went up from 4.4% to 6%. However, this increase was not significant. The series comprised 398 cases, with carcinoma of the prostate (19%), lung (18%), breast (14%) and kidney (10%) accounting for 61%. The symptoms were evaluated in accordance with the patients rating of pain, motor deficits, sphincter control and paraesthesia, whereas the clinical manifestations were classified on the basis of motor deficit and bladder dysfunction. During the period preceding the diagnosis of SCC, 83% of the patients suffered from back pain, 67% from deteriorating gait and 48% had retention of the urine. In 35% of the patients there was no sphincter disturbance and 10% had normal sensory function. The outcome of treatment was estimated by changes in motor deficits and sphincter function, and depended primarily on the patients condition at the time of the diagnosis. Of the patients who were able to walk before treatment, 79% remained ambulatory, whereas only 18% of the non-ambulatory patients regained walking ability. Patients treated by decompressive laminectomy followed by radiotherapy apparently had a better response than patients treated with surgery or irradiation alone, but when the patients pre-treatment motor function was taken into account, no significant difference was observed. The study may call for a properly randomized trial with careful stratification of tumour biology, performance status and neurological deficits.

Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: results with a new treatment protocol.

Greenberg HS, Kim JH, Posner JB. Ann Neurol 1980 Oct;8(4):361-6

Eighty-three patients with epidural spinal cord compression, from metastatic cancer were treated with high-dose adrenocorticosteroids and a new radiation fractionation protocol. Only those patients were included who had complete or almost complete block on myelography and who had not received prior radiation therapy to the area of compression. Patients were given 100 mg of dexamethasone intravenously at the time of diagnosis and 500 rads of radiation on each of the first three days. After a four-day rest, radiation therapy was continued at 300 rads to a total dose of 3,000 rads. The effects of this new protocol on the patient's motor abilities did not differ from those of previous protocols, namely, 47 of 83 patients (57%) were ambulatory after treatment, with no responses in patients totally paraplegic before treatment. However, early administration of high doses of dexamethasone substantially ameliorated pain in the majority of patients, with relief often coming within hours after the drug was given. On the basis of these data, we recommend high doses of adrenocorticosteroids combined with radiation therapy for acute treatment of spinal cord compression. The optimum fractionation schedule for radiation therapy is not established.

Radiotherapeutic management of spinal metastases.

Janjan NA  J Pain Symptom Manage 1996 Jan;11(1):47-56

Department of Radiotherapy, University of Texas, Houston, USA.

Radiotherapy remains the primary treatment of malignant epidural spinal cord compression. Therapeutic success depends on diagnosis before the development of neurological compromise and the prompt initiation of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy alone is effective in over 85% of cases of spinal cord compression that occur in highly radioresponsive tumors (multiple myeloma, germ cell or lymphoproliferative tumors). In the more common tumors, like breast, prostate, and lung cancer, response to radiotherapy is based on presenting neurologic deficits, extent of disease, duration of symptoms, and overall clinical status, including other sites of metastatic involvement. Surgery is recommended in addition to radiotherapy in selected cases, and further study is needed to better define the prognostic and neurological parameters for the surgical management of spinal cord compression. Improvements in outcome in the treatment of spinal cord compression will require approaches like combined modality therapy because of the limitations primarily imposed by the radiation tolerance of the spinal cord.

Malignant epidural spinal cord compression associated with a paravertebral mass: its radiotherapeutic outcome on radiosensitivity.

Kim RY, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993 Dec 1;27(5):1079-83

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical characteristics and functional outcome of malignant epidural spinal cord compression associated with a paravertebral mass. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1987 and 1990, 136 patients with epidural spinal cord compression were treated with irradiation. Of these, 25 patients (18%) had epidural spinal cord compression associated with a paravertebral mass. This report is based on analysis of these 25 patients. Fourteen patients received 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. Seven received 4000 cGy in 16 fractions. Four received 2000 cGy in 5 fractions. Motor function was evaluated by five grades. RESULTS: Lung cancer accounted for the majority of epidural spinal cord compression with a paravertebral mass (60%) followed by lymphoma (8%) and kidney tumor (8%). This pattern of epidural spinal cord compression has a longer duration of pain before developing neurologic symptoms and has a high propensity of the upper thoracic spine involvement by an apical lung cancers. The functional outcome of radiation treatment reveals a significant difference between moderately radiosensitive tumors (lung, prostate, cervix, esophagus) and very radiosensitive tumor (lymphoma). None of the nonambulatory patients became ambulatory following radiotherapy except for the very radiosensitive tumors. Higher doses of radiation treatment (4000 cGy in 16 fractions) did not improve functional outcome. CONCLUSION: Due to the larger tumor burden, radiation treatment for epidural spinal cord compression associated with a paravertebral mass is not as effective as treatment of epidural spinal cord compression without a paravertebral mass except for the very radiosensitive tumor. Therefore, combined treatment modality might be beneficial for improving functional outcome.

Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy.

van der Linden YM, Dijkstra SP, Vonk EJ, Marijnen CA, Leer JW; Dutch Bone Metastasis Study Group.  Cancer. 2005 Jan 15;103(2):320-8

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Adequate prediction of survival is important in deciding on treatment for patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. The authors reviewed 342 patients with painful spinal metastases without neurologic impairment who were treated conservatively within a large, prospectively randomized radiotherapy trial. Response to radiotherapy and prognostic factors for survival were studied. METHODS: The data base of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study was used. Response to treatment and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were studied using a Cox regression model. A scoring system was developed to predict OS. RESULTS: Responses were noted in 73% of patients. In 3% of patients, spinal cord compression was reported a mean of 3.5 months after randomization. The median OS was 7 months, and significant predictors for survival were Karnofsky performance score, primary tumor (multivariate analysis; both P < 0.001), and the absence of visceral metastases (multivariate analysis; P = 0.02). A scoring system based on these predictors was developed, and 34% of patients were in Group A (median OS = 3.0 months), 48% of patients were in Group B (median OS = 9.0 months), and 18% of patients were in Group C (median OS = 18.7 months). Group C was comprised of patients with breast carcinoma, a good performance, and no visceral metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with spinal metastases have a limited life expectancy and should be treated with caution regarding surgical procedures. Radiotherapy is a safe and effective, noninvasive treatment modality for pain. The new scoring system will enable physicians to select patients who may survive long enough to benefit from more radical treatment.