Neoplastic Meningitis   (review article here and here and image here, here).

(From the NCCN) Neoplastic meningitis and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis refer to the multifocal seeding of the leptomeninges by malignant cells. Carcinomatous meningitis occurs when these cells originate from a solid tumor. When this is related to a systemic lymphoma, it is called lymphomatous meningitis.

These patients are usually treat with localized radiation plus CSF chemotherapy (go here) and see the current NCCN guidelines for treatment of leptomeningeal cancer (go here)

 Tumor cells gain access to the leptomeninges by hematogenous dissemination or by direct extension. Once these cells reach the CSF, they are disseminated throughout the neuraxis by the constant flow of CSF. The CSF travels from the ventricles through the foramen of Magendie and Luschka to the spinal canal and over the cortical convexities to the arachnoid granulations. Infiltration of the leptomeninges by any malignancy is a serious complication that results in substantial morbidity and mortality.

Neoplastic meningitis occurs in approximately 5% of patients with cancer. This disorder is being diagnosed with increasing frequency as patients live longer and as neuroimaging studies improve. The most common cancers to involve the leptomeninges are breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma. Without treatment, the median survival of patients diagnosed with this disorder is 4 to 6 weeks, with death resulting from progressive neurologic dysfunction.

The goals of treatment in patients with leptomeningeal metastases are to improve or stabilize the neurologic status of the patient and to prolong survival. Standard therapy involves RT to symptomatic sites of the neuraxis and to disease visible on neuroimaging studies, in addition to intrathecal chemotherapy. These therapies increase the median survival to 3 to 6 months and often provide effective local control, allowing patients to die from systemic rather than neurologic complications of their neoplasm. Early diagnosis and therapy are critical to preserving neurologic function.

Patient Evaluation

Patients present with signs and symptoms ranging from injury to nerves that traverse the subarachnoid space, direct tumor invasion of the brain or spinal cord, alteration in the local blood supply, obstruction of normal CSF flow pathways leading to increased intracranial pressure, or interference with normal brain function. Patients should have a physical examination with a careful neurologic evaluation; MRI of the brain and spine should also be done, if the patient has appropriate neurologic symptoms or signs. A definitive diagnosis is most commonly made by lumbar puncture. The CSF protein is typically increased, and there may be a pleocytosis or decreased glucose levels. The CSF cytology is positive approximately 50% of the time with the first lumbar puncture, and 85% of the time after three CSF examinations in patients who are ultimately proven to have neoplastic meningitis. However, the CSF cytology is persistently negative in 10% to 15% of patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. In these cases, (1) a suspicious CSF examination (eg, increased protein, low glucose, and/or a pleocytosis) combined with suggestive clinical findings (eg, multifocal neuraxis involvement, such as cranial nerve palsies and a lumbar radiculopathy that cannot be explained otherwise); and/or (2) suggestive radiologic features (eg, subarachnoid masses, diffuse contrast enhancement of the meninges, or hydrocephalus without a mass lesion) can be sufficient to treat when the patient is known to have a systemic malignancy. Although a positive CSF cytology in patients with solid tumors is virtually always diagnostic, reactive lymphocytes from infections (eg, herpes zoster infection) can often be mistaken for malignant lymphocytes.

Patient Stratification for Treatment

Once the diagnosis has been established, the patient's overall status should be carefully assessed to determine how aggressively the carcinomatous or lymphomatous meningitis should be treated. Unfortunately, this disease is most common in patients with advanced, treatment-refractory systemic malignancies for whom treatment options are limited. In general, fixed neurologic deficits (such as cranial nerve palsies or paraplegia) do not resolve with therapy, although encephalopathies may improve dramatically. As a result, patients should be stratified into “poor risk” and “good risk” groups.

The poor-risk group includes patients with a low KPS; multiple, serious, fixed neurologic deficits; extensive systemic disease with few treatment options; bulky CNS disease; and neoplastic meningitis related to encephalopathy. The good-risk group includes patients with a high KPS, no fixed neurologic deficits, minimal systemic disease, and reasonable systemic treatment options. Many patients fall in between these two groups, and clinical judgment will dictate how aggressive their treatment should be.

Treatment Algorithm for Neoplastic Meningitis

Patients in the poor-risk group are usually offered supportive care measures. RT is commonly administered to symptomatic sites (eg, to the whole brain for increased intracranial pressure or to the lumbosacral spine for a developing cauda equina syndrome). If the patient stabilizes or improves, a more aggressive treatment approach may be considered. Patients with exceptionally chemosensitive tumors (eg, small cell lung cancer, lymphoma) may be treated.

Good-risk patients can receive radiation to symptomatic sites and to areas of bulky disease identified on neuroimaging studies. In addition, intrathecal or intraventricular (using a surgically implanted subcutaneous reservoir and ventricular catheter [SRVC]) chemotherapy can be administered; systemic chemotherapy can be considered. Initially, intrathecal chemotherapy is usually given by lumbar puncture, and the SRVC is placed later to administer the drugs more conveniently. Initiation of chemotherapy should not be delayed for flow study. When dosing intrathecal chemotherapy for adults, no adjustment is made based on weight or body surface area. With methotrexate, thiotepa, and cytarabine, a typical dosing schedule is initially twice a week for 4 weeks; if the CSF cytology becomes negative, then continue with once-a-week administration of intrathecal chemotherapy for another 4 weeks, followed by once-a-month maintenance doses. Methotrexate (10-12 mg) is the drug most frequently used for intrathecal administration. Oral leucovorin (folinic acid) can be given (10 mg twice a day for 3 days starting the day of treatment) to reduce possible systemic toxicity without interfering with the efficacy of methotrexate in the CSF. Intrathecal thiotepa (10 mg) can also be used in solid tumors, and cytarabine (50 mg) is often administered for lymphomatous meningitis. A depot form of cytarabine is now available that allows patients with lymphomatous meningitis to be treated every 2 weeks initially (rather than twice per week) followed by once-a-month maintenance treatment. In a randomized controlled trial, depot cytarabine was found to increase the time to neurologic progression, with a response rate comparable to methotrexate, while offering the benefit of a less demanding schedule of injection. One study suggests that high-dose systemic methotrexate might be better than intrathecal therapy. If an SRVC is placed, a CSF flow scan should be strongly considered. CSF flow abnormalities are common in patients with neoplastic meningitis and often lead to increased intracranial pressure. Administering chemotherapy into the ventricle of a patient with a ventricular outlet obstruction increases the patient's risk for leukoencephalopathy. In addition, the agent administered will not reach the lumbar subarachnoid space where the original CSF cytology was positive. CSF flow scans are easily performed in most nuclear medicine departments. Indium 111-DTPA is administered into the SRVC, and imaging of the brain and spine is performed immediately after injection and then imaging is done again at 4 and 24 hours. If significant flow abnormalities are seen, RT is administered to the sites of obstruction and a CSF flow scan is repeated. If CSF flow normalizes, which occurs most commonly in radiosensitive neoplasms, intrathecal chemotherapy commences. If significant flow abnormalities remain, then the patient should be treated as a poor-risk patient (ie, with supportive measures). For patients with a normal CSF flow scan and otherwise stable disease, induction intrathecal chemotherapy should be given for 4 to 6 weeks (see ) and then the patient should be reassessed clinically and with a repeat CSF cytology. Because the cytology is much less likely to be positive from the SRVC than from the lumbar subarachnoid space, it is critical that it be sampled from the site where the cytology was originally positive. If the CSF cytology was originally negative, then reassess from the lumbar region. If the patient is clinically stable or improving and there is no clinical or radiologic evidence of progressive leptomeningeal disease, the patient should receive another month of “induction” intrathecal chemotherapy or should consider switching intrathecal drugs for 4 weeks. This regimen should be followed by 1 week per month of maintenance therapy if the cytology has converted to negative. The CSF cytology status should be followed every month.

Progressive Disease

The patient's clinical and CSF status should be followed every 2 months. However, if the patient's clinical status is deteriorating from progressive leptomeningeal disease or if the cytology is persistently positive, the clinician has two options: (1) chemotherapy; (2) supportive care, which may include RT to symptom sites.